This wall clay brick tile terracotta manufacturer page preserves a LOPO record from 2013. Image WF230 was associated with a 240 × 60 × 11 mm main piece and two corner descriptions. Wall clay brick tile and manufacturer identify the old page; they do not confirm a current product, material, manufacturer status, capacity or commercial offer. Historical full-body, performance, application, packing, container, MOQ and lead-time fields all require current verification.
Historic WF230 Sizes and Corner Records
The archived main dimension was 240 × 60 × 11 mm. Corner entries were (174 + 50) × 60 × 11 mm and (60 + 60) × 240 × 11 mm. These exact values help preserve the 2013 record, but none is a current dimensional promise. The old plus-sign notation is not expanded into a modern geometry or detail here.
Ask LOPO whether a present product can respond to the intended proportion and corner expression. Request verified current dimensions, available companion pieces, samples and documentation for the exact proposal before those fields enter drawings, schedules or quantities.
What the Original WF230 Image Supports
The image can help describe a narrow brick-like module, fired-clay appearance and repeated wall rhythm. It cannot confirm a current product composition, texture, color range, edge character or exact relationship to WF230. Photography and screen settings affect appearance, and one image cannot define an acceptable production range.
Use the photograph as a conversation aid, then review several current physical samples. Record the proposed product, sample date and intended visual range so the design basis remains current and traceable.
Study the current pieces with the surrounding palette and at the viewing distances important to the project. A subtle clay texture may matter nearby while the repeated module dominates from farther away. Describe those appearance goals in the review record. They help distinguish what the team wants visually from what must be supported by separate current documents.
Manufacturer Is Not a Current Status or Capacity Claim
Manufacturer in an archived title does not prove present facilities, production scope, capacity, quality credentials, market coverage or delivery ability. A current supplier review should use the same live brief for every candidate and request a clearly identified product, samples, applicable documents, commercial assumptions and dated program information.
Record which statements are supported and which remain open. Separately define the desired narrow brick proportion, clay character, texture and corner expression. This creates a fair, traceable review without treating WF230 as a current manufacturing or performance promise.
The comparison record should name the current product, sample identity, supplier documents, quantity basis, destination and program assumptions. It should also separate statements about the visible brick tile from claims about the complete wall. That distinction helps reviewers see exactly what each current document supports.
Separate the Tile from the Complete Wall
A visible wall tile is one element in a project-specific design. Suitability depends on the actual location, interfaces, environment, regulations and project responsibilities. The 2013 page does not define a current exterior or interior assembly, and the old use wording cannot resolve those questions. Current drawings, product information and applicable evidence should govern the review.
No generic structural or field-work instructions are provided here. Any current proposal must be developed and assessed by the responsible parties for the named project.
2013 Claims and Commercial Data
| Historic main size | 240 × 60 × 11 mm |
|---|---|
| Historic corner sizes | (174 + 50) × 60 × 11 mm; (60 + 60) × 240 × 11 mm |
| Historic material wording | Full-body; 2013 archive description only, current confirmation required |
| Historic absorption wording | Approximately 4%; archive value only |
| Old function labels | Acid, heat, non-slip, wear and firebrick; not current evidence |
| Old application fields | 2013 use descriptions only |
| Old commercial data | Packing, 20-foot-container capacity, MOQ, sample lead time and order lead time; current response required |
| Status | Historic reference pending complete product-specific confirmation |
Archive boundary: Old clay and full-body wording, sizes, corner descriptions, approximately 4% absorption, acid, heat, non-slip, wear, firebrick, application, packing, capacity, MOQ and delivery statements are not current proof. In particular, firebrick language is not a current fire-performance declaration for a product or wall. Request dated documents tied to the proposed current material and project scope.
Prepare a Current Wall-Brick Supplier Inquiry
Share the country, building and room or facade context, drawings, approximate area, preferred fired-clay wall-brick character, neighboring materials, destination and document requirements. Explain whether WF230 and its historic dimensions are essential references. Ask for current samples, verified main and corner dimensions, composition information, applicable technical documents, packing, MOQ and lead-time basis.
Use a dated inquiry schedule to track the current product code, sample references, dimension confirmation, document scope, commercial assumptions and unanswered items. Do not treat one approved appearance sample as proof of technical or commercial claims. Keeping those review tracks distinct makes it easier to see which evidence supports each project decision.
Explore current terracotta facade tile information, terracotta cladding projects and the wall-cladding terracotta tile gallery for relevant current context. Use them to refine questions, not as evidence that another product or project applies to WF230.
Discuss a Current Wall Clay Brick Tile
Contact LOPO through the contact page or email roger@lopoterracotta.com. Send the archive URL, project drawings, approximate quantity, appearance direction, destination and required documents. LOPO can respond with current product and commercial information while every 2013 specification and functional claim remains clearly historical. Ask for a dated response that ties each sample and document to the proposed product.