WRS6362 Thin Office Facade Brick: 2013 Archive Guide clarifies a former LOPO page without presenting its title as a current recommendation. The archive linked WRS6362 with office-building exterior wall decorative thin bricks. Office, exterior, decorative and thin are historical descriptors only. They do not establish present application, appearance, mass, wall compatibility or performance.
Read the 2013 WRS6362 record
The old listing included a 240 × 60 × 11 mm field brick and two corner formats. It also carried full-body wording, about 4% water absorption, generic functions, uses, packing, 20-foot-container capacity, minimum order, sample timing and order lead time. These fields are not current technical or commercial evidence.
| Archive item | WRS6362 |
|---|---|
| Archived field format | 240 × 60 × 11 mm |
| Archived corner formats | (174 + 50) × 60 × 11 mm or (60 + 60) × 240 × 11 mm |
| Archived material field | Full-body wording; about 4% absorption |
| Archived context | Thin decorative brick for an office-building exterior; current scope unverified |
The page’s only original image remains for recognition. It is not a calibrated sample, proof of current availability or evidence for an office facade.
Translate decorative into an appearance brief
Decorative effect may come from colour, variation, texture, slender proportions, course direction or contrast with adjacent materials. The archive does not define which attribute was intended. Describe whether the project seeks a quiet linear field, lively tonal blend, close-range texture or another visual effect.
Review labelled current samples beside glazing, metal, stone, coatings and joint materials under representative light. Ask for a normal range, not one selected piece. Record product code, colour, surface, sample date and role. Physical benchmarks should govern appearance; the old image remains only a coordination clue.
Limit thin and office-building wording
The 11 mm figure was an archived nominal dimension. “Thin” does not establish low mass, strength, attachment suitability, ease of handling or a comparison with another product. Likewise, office-building wording does not identify building height, exposure, substrate, wall system, jurisdiction or project requirements.
Ask for current drawings, tolerances and mass data for the exact candidate. State the real building type, location and facade context. Qualified project professionals must assess the product within the complete proposed wall. Do not infer suitability from the former title or nominal dimension.
Use exterior formats cautiously
The field and corner dimensions can inform early module studies but do not confirm current geometry, compatibility, colour matching or availability. Exterior wording does not prove moisture, weathering, freeze-thaw, fire, attachment or whole-wall performance. Obtain current product drawings and applicable evidence before detailed coordination.
Qualified professionals must resolve project-specific substrate, movement and interfaces with confirmed system information. This archive supplies no generic loads, spans, support spacing, anchors or installation instructions. If a successor differs from WRS6362, update elevations, quantities, sample approvals and procurement records together.
Apply the full archive boundary
Archive boundary: WRS6362, full-body material wording, all field and corner sizes, about 4% absorption, acid, heat, non-slip, wear and firebrick functions, uses, packing, 20-foot-container capacity, MOQ, samples and order lead time belong only to 2013.
Old heat and firebrick wording does not establish current fire performance. Request dated evidence naming the exact product, specimen, method, result, scope and market. Reconfirm colours, surfaces, sizes, corners, quantity, packaging, minimum order, sample status, production window, delivery and payment in current writing.
Link each sample, drawing, report and quotation to one candidate. Separate appearance approval, product review, complete facade assessment and commercial acceptance in the decision register. Clearly mark superseded records so they cannot overwrite the current product identity.
Explore current bricks and projects
Review LOPO’s current terracotta brick overview for present products and formats.
Browse terracotta projects for office facade composition ideas.
Visit the architectural terracotta gallery to compare bricks, tiles and panels.
Use the LOPO contact page for samples and documentation.
Project images can guide design, but their exact products, assemblies, evidence and approvals are not transferable by appearance.
Request a current WRS6362 review
Share the location, building use, facade area, elevations, desired colour and texture, corner conditions, adjacent materials, approximate quantity and programme. Cite WRS6362 and the archived formats so LOPO can trace the record without assuming office or exterior suitability.
Email roger@lopoterracotta.com or use the contact form. Request current identification, representative samples, dated drawings, applicable evidence and project-specific commercial information.
Before selection, make sure sample codes match every drawing, report and quotation. Track unresolved appearance, dimension, exterior-use and supply questions in a dated log. This preserves WRS6362 as an archive reference without presenting thin, decorative or office-building wording as current proof.
For appearance review, classify every piece as inspiration, a representative range sample or a proposed production benchmark. Note the viewing light, distance, adjacent facade finishes and date. Document the intended course direction and acceptable colour or texture variation. If a successor is proposed, retire WRS6362 from active schedules while retaining it as an archive cross-reference, then update elevations, corners and quantities consistently.
Create separate review fields for nominal dimensions, tolerances, mass basis, exterior product evidence, complete-wall evidence and commercial status. Record each document issuer, date and scope. When building requirements, product identity or evidence changes, reopen the relevant decision rather than carrying an old approval forward. Before specification or purchase, confirm that the physical benchmark, current drawings, project-relevant documents and quotation all describe the same proposed brick and production source. Preserve superseded samples and reports separately so they cannot overwrite current identification. Recheck the register after any facade revision, product substitution or change in project requirements. Archive terminology should stay visibly separated from every current technical and commercial approval.