This exterior wall decorative terracotta ceramic tile page preserves a LOPO record from 2013. Image WF562 was paired with a 240 × 60 × 11 mm main tile and two corner-size entries. Exterior wall, decorative, terracotta and ceramic tile are archive-title language; they do not prove a current product category, composition, application or complete wall solution. Historic full-body, performance, use, packing and commercial statements need current product-specific and project-specific confirmation.
Historic WF562 Sizes and Corner Records
The archived main dimension was 240 × 60 × 11 mm. Corner entries were (174 + 50) × 60 × 11 mm and (60 + 60) × 240 × 11 mm. These exact values help preserve the 2013 record, but none is a current dimensional promise. The old plus-sign notation is not expanded into a modern geometry or detail here.
Ask LOPO whether a present product can respond to the intended proportion and corner expression. Request verified current dimensions, available companion pieces, samples and documentation for the exact proposal before those fields enter drawings, schedules or quantities.
What the Original WF562 Image Supports

The image can help describe a narrow brick-like module, fired-clay appearance and repeated wall rhythm. It cannot confirm a current product composition, texture, color range, edge character or exact relationship to WF562. Photography and screen settings affect appearance, and one image cannot define an acceptable production range.
Use the photograph as a conversation aid, then review several current physical samples. Record the proposed product, sample date and intended visual range so the design basis remains current and traceable.
Study the current pieces with the surrounding palette and at the viewing distances important to the project. A subtle clay texture may matter nearby while the repeated module dominates from farther away. Describe those appearance goals in the review record. They help distinguish what the team wants visually from what must be supported by separate current documents.
Decorative Ceramic Tile Is an Appearance Direction
The old title can support a conversation about a narrow fired-clay module used as a visible decorative layer. It cannot establish a current surface, color range, composition or suitability for a particular exterior wall. Define the desired warmth, texture, tonal movement, corner expression and relationship to neighboring materials in the current design brief.
Compare several current physical samples and record their product identity and review date. Keep aesthetic approval separate from functional evidence. An accepted appearance does not verify the archived absorption, acid, heat, wear, non-slip or firebrick wording.
Review the current pieces with adjacent materials and at viewing distances important to the project. Describe whether the tile should read as a quiet repeated field or a stronger decorative layer. These observations make the visual brief more precise without turning appearance approval into evidence of exterior suitability.
Separate the Tile from the Complete Wall
A visible wall tile is one element in a project-specific design. Suitability depends on the actual location, interfaces, environment, regulations and project responsibilities. The 2013 page does not define a current exterior or interior assembly, and the old use wording cannot resolve those questions. Current drawings, product information and applicable evidence should govern the review.
No generic structural or field-work instructions are provided here. Any current proposal must be developed and assessed by the responsible parties for the named project.
2013 Claims and Commercial Data
| Historic main size | 240 × 60 × 11 mm |
|---|---|
| Historic corner sizes | (174 + 50) × 60 × 11 mm; (60 + 60) × 240 × 11 mm |
| Historic material wording | Full-body; 2013 archive description only, current confirmation required |
| Historic absorption wording | Approximately 4%; archive value only |
| Old function labels | Acid, heat, non-slip, wear and firebrick; not current evidence |
| Old application fields | 2013 use descriptions only |
| Old commercial data | Packing, 20-foot-container capacity, MOQ, sample lead time and order lead time; current response required |
| Status | Historic reference pending complete product-specific confirmation |
Archive boundary: Old clay and full-body wording, sizes, corner descriptions, approximately 4% absorption, acid, heat, non-slip, wear, firebrick, application, packing, capacity, MOQ and delivery statements are not current proof. In particular, firebrick language is not a current fire-performance declaration for a product or wall. Request dated documents tied to the proposed current material and project scope.
Prepare a Current Decorative Tile Inquiry
Share the country, building and room or facade context, drawings, approximate area, preferred fired-clay wall-brick character, neighboring materials, destination and document requirements. Explain whether WF562 and its historic dimensions are essential references. Ask for current samples, verified main and corner dimensions, composition information, applicable technical documents, packing, MOQ and lead-time basis.
Use a dated inquiry schedule to track the current product code, sample references, dimension confirmation, document scope, commercial assumptions and unanswered items. Do not treat one approved appearance sample as proof of technical or commercial claims. Keeping those review tracks distinct makes it easier to see which evidence supports each project decision.
Explore current terracotta facade tile information, terracotta cladding projects and the wall-cladding terracotta tile gallery for relevant current context. Use them to refine questions, not as evidence that another product or project applies to WF562.
Discuss a Decorative Terracotta Tile
Contact LOPO through the contact page or email roger@lopoterracotta.com. Send the archive URL, project drawings, approximate quantity, appearance direction, destination and required documents. LOPO can respond with current product and commercial information while every 2013 specification and functional claim remains clearly historical. Ask for a dated response that ties each sample and document to the proposed product.
