Brick Texture Terracotta Cladding Facade Tile preserves a LOPO page from 2013. The archive associated WRS2332 with a 240 × 60 × 11 mm main format, two corner descriptions, full-body wording and broad functional and commercial fields. Brick texture, cladding and facade application are old title clues. They do not prove a current texture, product category, facade suitability, material or complete wall solution. Current conclusions require samples and project-specific documents.
Review the 2013 Wall-Brick Entry
The archive included main and corner dimensions, approximately 4% water absorption and broad acid, heat, non-slip, wear and firebrick wording. It also contained applications, packing, 20-foot-container capacity, minimum order, sample timing and order lead-time fields. Every item is preserved as history rather than a current specification or quotation.
| Archived main format | 240 × 60 × 11 mm |
|---|---|
| Archived corner formats | (174 + 50) × 60 × 11 mm or (60 + 60) × 240 × 11 mm |
| Archived construction wording | Full-body tile |
| Archived absorption field | About 4% |
| Archived title cues | Brick texture, cladding and facade; archive title wording only, current sample and project confirmation required |
The original WRS2332 image remains once as archived. It can suggest a split-face visual direction, but it is not a calibrated texture range, proof of veneer suitability or evidence of current production.
Define Brick Texture with Current Samples
Brick texture may describe grain, relief, irregularity or another visual reference, but the title does not define texture scale, depth, edge character or normal range. Ask LOPO to identify a current product and provide representative labelled pieces. Review several faces instead of assuming one image establishes the production appearance.
Record texture prominence, fired-clay character, viewing distance, lighting and relationship to adjacent finishes. Use a sample register for current product code, finish, date and role. This keeps the archive photograph as context and labelled current pieces as the appearance basis.
Cladding and Facade Need Project Review
Cladding and facade describe an archived application direction rather than present suitability. Share the building, wall context, exposure, design stage and evidence needs. LOPO can respond within its stated scope, while responsible professionals assess the complete proposal for the actual project.
Appearance approval does not verify archived absorption, acid, heat, non-slip, wear or firebrick statements. This page provides no generic structural or field-work instructions.
A current review register should identify the proposed tile, labelled sample set, texture range, verified field and corner dimensions, product documents, project evidence and commercial status. Record the issuer and date of each item, and leave missing information open rather than borrowing from WRS2332. If the current product or texture changes, update drawings, sample approvals, evidence and quotation together so every reviewer follows one traceable selection.
Use Archived Formats Only as Design Cues
The 240 × 60 mm face can inspire fine horizontal courses or vertical texture. The corner notations may trace former return pieces, yet they do not confirm current geometry, tolerance, colour matching, compatibility or supply. Request dated drawings for every proposed field and corner unit before updating elevations and quantities.
Qualified professionals must coordinate the building-specific substrate, movement, interfaces and wall proposal with current system information. This page offers no generic loads, spans, support spacing, anchors or installation instructions. If the current tile differs from the archive, revise design records, sample approvals and procurement information together.
Keep material and function claims historical
Archive boundary: full-body material wording, the main and corner dimensions, about 4% absorption, acid, heat, non-slip, wear and firebrick functions, uses, packing, 20-foot-container capacity, MOQ, sample timing and order lead time belong only to the 2013 page.
None of the old function terms establishes present performance, classification or project suitability. Heat-resistant or firebrick language is not a current fire conclusion. Ask for dated reports or declarations that identify the exact proposed product, specimen, method, result, scope and market. Let qualified project reviewers decide which criteria and approvals apply.
Reconfirm available sizes, surface, red range, corner units, quantity, packaging, minimum order, production window, delivery and payment in a current quotation. Keep samples, drawings, evidence and commercial records traceable to the same candidate so information from different tile families is not mixed.
Explore current products and project ideas
Review LOPO’s current terracotta tile overview for present colors, surfaces and formats.
Browse terracotta projects for narrow modules and facade rhythm.
Visit the architectural terracotta gallery to compare brick, tile and panel references.
Use the LOPO contact page for current samples, drawings and documentation.
Reference projects can sharpen colour and scale decisions, but their exact materials, assemblies, evidence and approvals do not transfer automatically.
Request a Current Brick-Texture Facade Tile
Share the project country, wall location, elevations, approximate area, desired brick texture, clay palette, corner conditions, destination and documentation needs. Mention WRS2332 and the archived main and corner formats as source references, not confirmed current specifications.
Email roger@lopoterracotta.com or use the contact form. Request current product identification, representative labelled samples, verified dimensions, applicable evidence and current commercial terms.
Create a dated comparison register for product code, appearance, dimensions, corners, sample role, drawing revision, evidence and commercial status. Keep visual approval separate from technical and supply review. If a successor product is offered, use its current identifier consistently and preserve the 2013 page only as a historical reference.
Before approval, confirm that current field and corner samples, drawings, evidence and commercial records all use the same product identity. If any item changes, update the comparison register so the archive cannot overwrite the live selection.
Before release, verify that the accepted texture range and current product documents correspond to the same field and corner proposal.