This brick look wall tile made of terracotta clay page preserves a LOPO record from 2013. The archive associated image WHR770 with a 240 × 60 × 11 mm main tile and two corner descriptions. Brick look and made of terracotta clay belong to the old title; they do not establish a current finish, composition, product or complete wall solution. Historic performance, application and commercial fields also require current verification before the page is used for anything beyond source identification and early visual discussion.

Historic WHR770 Sizes and Corner Records

The archived main dimension was 240 × 60 × 11 mm. Corner entries were (174 + 50) × 60 × 11 mm and (60 + 60) × 240 × 11 mm. These exact values help preserve the 2013 record, but none is a current dimensional promise. The old plus-sign notation is not expanded into a modern geometry or detail here.

Ask LOPO whether a present product can respond to the intended proportion and corner expression. Request verified current dimensions, available companion pieces, samples and documentation for the exact proposal before those fields enter drawings, schedules or quantities.

What the Original WHR770 Image Supports

Archived WHR770 brick-look terracotta wall tile image
Original WHR770 image retained from the 2013 archive; current material, surface, dimensions and availability require confirmation.

The image can help describe a narrow brick-like module, fired-clay appearance and repeated wall rhythm. It cannot confirm a current product composition, texture, color range, edge character or exact relationship to WHR770. Photography and screen settings affect appearance, and one image cannot define an acceptable production range.

Use the photograph as a conversation aid, then review several current physical samples. Record the proposed product, sample date and intended visual range so the design basis remains current and traceable.

Study the current pieces with the surrounding palette and at the viewing distances important to the project. A subtle clay texture may matter nearby while the repeated module dominates from farther away. Describe those appearance goals in the review record. They help distinguish what the team wants visually from what must be supported by separate current documents.

Brick Look Is Archive Appearance Language

The phrase brick look expresses a visual relationship, not a verified current surface. A live brief should describe what matters: slender proportion, clay warmth, texture, tonal movement, edge definition and the way corners should read architecturally. It should not assume that the title proves an existing finish or that old material language confirms current composition.

LOPO can compare that brief with current products and samples. The responsible project team can evaluate the selected material and complete wall independently. This keeps aesthetic exploration separate from unsupported technical conclusions.

The phrase made of terracotta clay also remains an archive title statement. Current composition should be confirmed through information for the proposed product rather than assumed from the page name. Likewise, brick look does not establish whether a present piece is smooth, textured, varied or uniform. Only the current product and samples can answer those questions.

Separate the Tile from the Complete Wall

A visible wall tile is one element in a project-specific design. Suitability depends on the actual location, interfaces, environment, regulations and project responsibilities. The 2013 page does not define a current exterior or interior assembly, and the old use wording cannot resolve those questions. Current drawings, product information and applicable evidence should govern the review.

No generic structural or field-work instructions are provided here. Any current proposal must be developed and assessed by the responsible parties for the named project.

2013 Claims and Commercial Data

Historic main size240 × 60 × 11 mm
Historic corner sizes(174 + 50) × 60 × 11 mm; (60 + 60) × 240 × 11 mm
Historic absorption wordingApproximately 4%; archive value only
Old function labelsAcid, heat, non-slip, wear and firebrick; not current evidence
Old application fields2013 use descriptions only
Old commercial dataPacking, 20-foot-container capacity, MOQ and lead time; current response required
StatusHistoric reference pending complete product-specific confirmation

Archive boundary: Old clay wording, sizes, corner descriptions, approximately 4% absorption, acid, heat, non-slip, wear, firebrick, application, packing, capacity, MOQ and delivery statements are not current proof. In particular, firebrick language is not a current fire-performance declaration for a product or wall. Request dated documents tied to the proposed current material and project scope.

Prepare a Current Brick-Look Tile Review

Share the country, building and room or facade context, drawings, approximate area, preferred brick-like character, neighboring materials, destination and document requirements. Explain whether WHR770 and its historic dimensions are essential references. Ask for current samples, verified main and corner dimensions, composition information, applicable technical documents, packing, MOQ and lead-time basis.

Use a dated inquiry schedule to track the current product code, sample references, dimension confirmation, document scope, commercial assumptions and unanswered items. Do not treat one approved appearance sample as proof of technical or commercial claims. Keeping those review tracks distinct makes it easier to see which evidence supports each project decision.

Explore current terracotta facade tile information, terracotta cladding projects and the wall-cladding terracotta tile gallery for relevant current context. Use them to refine questions, not as evidence that another product or project applies to WHR770.

Discuss a Current Brick-Look Wall Tile

Contact LOPO through the contact page or email roger@lopoterracotta.com. Send the archive URL, project drawings, approximate quantity, appearance direction, destination and required documents. LOPO can respond with current product and commercial information while every 2013 specification and functional claim remains clearly historical. Ask for a dated response that ties each sample and document to the proposed product.